NLRB

[Squid]

Can anyone tell me what the case is about at the NLRB?  What are we claiming?  What are we looking for?  Any specifics would be appreciated.

Now that is an excellent question..... Why doesn't the union be specific as to what exactly the union asked the NLRB to do?

[Buzz]

I don't know the legal specifics, but the core of the case is that the claimed "impasse" was bogus, in which case the prior contract was to remain in effect while talks continued and a new agreement was reached.

[WTF]

That's what I believe the case was about, it was a bogus impasse by the contractors.  That's what Michael said at the union meeting. That we were taking the contractors to nlrb for claiming a false impasse.

[mirrorcheck]

Remember last contract the union set up a lunch meeting and the dictator contractors didn't show up? That was ok right? Screw them...these wanna be gangsters are just out of touch millionaires. They (contractors)don't care about there reputation or the people that make them there money. All that money and there very souls are morally bankrupt. Have a great time selling that off trying to get across the great divide.