1181 Drivers Forum

DRIVERS' ROOM => 1181 Matters => Topic started by: Eucerin on April 20, 2020, 02:38:27 PM

Title: April 20
Post by: Eucerin on April 20, 2020, 02:38:27 PM
How do we stand, as far as wages and benefits for the pay period April 20 to April 26? Is their any word from 1181 or Pioneer?
Title: Re: April 20
Post by: PROUD MEMBER on April 20, 2020, 02:54:15 PM
Buzz posted it yesterday. 85% and medical UNLESS we hear differently.
Title: Re: April 20
Post by: Buzz on April 20, 2020, 05:22:24 PM
Another EB phone conference today.

Hope for the best and stay tuned.
Title: Re: April 20
Post by: Buzz on April 20, 2020, 06:17:13 PM
OK, just heard from Ernie. He says that so far nothing has changed. Unless we hear differently,  things remain the same as far as the 85%. He said not to pay attention to what you might read in some newspaper articles casting doubt on whether contractors will continue to be paid, as nobody has given any indication that they won't thus far.

I know none of us will rest easy until the city comes out and says point blank that the contracts will be honored for the duration, but we'll just have to wait on that until they do.

For now we'll just keep our fingers crossed and hope for the best going forward.
Title: Re: April 20
Post by: PROUD MEMBER on April 20, 2020, 07:00:06 PM
Not that it has anything to do with us but as far as contracts go the NYC MTA has 50,000 employees, all of which have been working 1 week on 1 week off and still getting paid for EVERY WEEK as usual. Then you have the teachers and paras who obviously not all of which are doing any work and those who do are not putting in the same amount of Tim as usual. And I'm sure there are other Unions who have contracts with the City that have similar circumstances. I don't see any one or any newspaper complaining about that. And just to make it clear I do not have a problem with any of these other Unions and what's going on with them. As far as we go it's not because I'm a school bus driver it's because I'm a Union and I have a contract. But as Ernie has said let's not jump to any conclusions!
Title: Re: April 20
Post by: Eucerin on April 20, 2020, 07:04:45 PM
Thanks again Buzz for keeping us up to date as much as possible...keeping my fingers cross that the status quo remains
Title: Re: April 20
Post by: yabba on April 20, 2020, 08:47:03 PM
do we know if pioneer contract includes the act of god clause they claim some of the company contracts have...
Title: Re: April 20
Post by: PROUD MEMBER on April 20, 2020, 10:29:52 PM
Does it make a difference?
I don't think this is considered an act of God. Unless God is living in China.
Title: Re: April 20
Post by: Buzz on April 21, 2020, 02:09:30 AM
I think he means "force majeure" clause. Got this definition on the web:

A force majeure clause in a contract would typically include a list such as acts of God, war, terrorism, acts of government, fire, plagues.

It also includes epidemics or a non- exhaustive list wherein the parties simply narrate what generally constitute force majeure events and thereafter add "and such other acts or events that are beyond the control of parties".


Title: Re: April 20
Post by: hognol on April 21, 2020, 04:43:31 PM
If acts of God or "force majeure" is not indicated in our current contract, I'm sure it will be in our next.
Title: Re: April 20
Post by: yabba on April 21, 2020, 07:14:29 PM
its not our contract   its the company and the city